Récits curieuxTIME FOR A STORY
REAL FACT Science and inventionsTHE CURIOSITY CABINET / 301

Do we really have ten times more bacteria than human cells?

A long-repeated figure was re-examined by returning to the estimates that supported it.

Writing assisted by AI Sources and details

Story illustration: Do we really have ten times more bacteria than human cells?
Illustration generated by AI
Your reading

The formula seems perfect to surprise: we would be ten times more bacterial than humans. But what exactly are we counting on, and on what measures is this report based? In 2016, Ron Sender, Shai Fuchs and Ron Milo took up these estimates.

For a reference man weighing seventy kilograms, their analysis estimates about 38 trillion bacteria and 30 trillion human cells. Here, a trillion means one thousand billion. The ratio is therefore close to one to one, with uncertainty and variation between individuals.

These numbers are not an exact inventory of each body. They also do not compare the masses of the two sets, and bacteria alone do not represent all microorganisms. The amazing lesson is both scientific and biological: a memorable number can travel far before someone returns to check how it was built.

✦

What we know

Estimates for a reference individual, not personal value; human cells and bacteria, not mass or complete set of the microbiota.

To go to the source

References consulted on September 21, 2026. Linked pages may be in another language.

Signaler une erreur ou apporter une précision

The real has yet Surprises.

The entire collection →
ONE TITLE, ONE GENDER, ONE ENVIE

Find your next reading.

Your preferences

Your favorites, reading position and settings are stored only in this browser. No account is required.

Adsterra and MGID are waiting for your agreement. Monetag is loaded from the opening of the page, regardless of this choice.

Find out more